Friday, January 23, 2009

2005 Worth May98 Mayhem







Unfortunately in Italy there are many reasons for despair. Entities should be compact in the protection of the territory, as Legambiente, show obvious internal rifts caused by the conflict of interests and ethics. Also through CIP6, green certificates, and an addition of the word "similar" to a European standard for renewable energy, in fact 7% of Enel bill was delivered to the petroleum and incineration: since 1992 more than € 35 billion.
Incinerators, by now, are sold to ordinary Italians as a miracle product by conference-show ( http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=LYKCOdU0A30 ), given by eminent academics and technical estimates.


the United States, however, do not build more incinerators by 1996.



This is also due to the battles of a great name of science as Paul Connett ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJ39AZqwq28&feature=related ) world authority in the field of waste management and theory of strategy "Zero Waste", which promotes the focus on waste management, recycling systems el'innesco virtuosos of the disposal of garbage with the precise time resolution strategies and goals. In adhering to this strategy are many realities in the world.



Monday, January 12, 2009

Locker Room Shower Boner



At Clermont-Ferrand ( http://www.lemonde.fr/doublon/article/2007/10/19/des- medecins-s-opposent-to-incineration-des-dechets_968824_959155.html ), France, by mobilizing a group of 531 medical associations and the environment was rejected plans for a waste incinerator in June 2008. Germany, for years, launched a very extensive collection, and above all commitment a lot of energy to environmental education.



In April of 2007 - just months before his death, Lorenzo Tomatis ( http://www.epidemiologiaeprevenzione.it/index_1.html ), the great Italian oncologist, spoke about the incinerators phrase lapidary:

"Hardly the new generations will forgive us for this suicide Environmental
Yet the media and some prominent scientists do nothing but reassure the public on the effectiveness and safety of incinerators ( http:// it.youtube.com / watch? v = BAEtdVn0KYY ) or - as is often they say to ennoble them - of "energy plants". In this regard it should be remembered that the European Union has banned the term "incinerator", because it considered it misleading. ( http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/it/s15002.htm ).
The incinerator is Europe's largest in Italy, in Brescia ( http://www.termovalorizzatori.it/blog/impianti/lombardia/brescia/ ). This facility receives awards and accolades, but sadly by the same private universities that receive generous donations from the companies that operate the incinerator.

is in this state of affairs that is difficult to obtain the analysis carried out on people close to incinerators. Many companies and many mayors, in fact, are unwilling to provide concrete data on the incidence of "diseases suspects" in the populations in the vicinity of the plant. Yet it would be essential to a round table discussion between proponents of incinerators and doctors against. Unfortunately, those expecting to find the availability of favorable political and medical incinerators for serious public debate for some time to be disappointed.
In Italy in recent years many committees have sprung up against incinerators. Besides this plant are officially just over 50, scattered throughout the national territory ( http://associazione-clan-destino.blogspot.com/2008/03/mappa-degli-inceneritori-in-italia.html ), but many others are rapidly activated. Also in that issue are not counted gl'inceneritori individuals dedicated to the treatment of wastes and also need to count the biomass power stations that, in fact, are incinerators.